TCC - Licenciatura em Letras (UAST)

URI permanente para esta coleçãohttps://arandu.ufrpe.br/handle/123456789/2944

Navegar

Resultados da Pesquisa

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
  • Imagem de Miniatura
    Item
    O processo de alfabetização na perspectiva de Emília Ferreiro, visando hipóteses coletadas na turma de 2º ano da Escola Professora Francisca Flor, em Santa Cruz da Baixa Verde-PE
    (2018) Lima, Juliana dos Santos; Berto, Jane Cristina Beltramini; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5158679260858327; http://lattes.cnpq.br/2633823504189806
    This study aims to understand the stages through which the child crosses to learn to read and write. In order to do so, a research was carried out on the process of constructing the children's writing hypotheses in the literacy phase in order to understand how the child conceives writing, based on research by Emília Ferreiro and other collaborators on the learning of children's writing . We will carry out in this research an analysis of the writing levels of the children of the 2nd year of Elementary School of the Municipal School Professor Francisca Flor located in the city of Santa Cruz of Baixa Verde, in order to detect how many students were in each alphabetical level and to analyze the performance of students in a text production based on studies by Ferreiro (1980). In the methodology, we made use of a research of collaborative character, having as instrument of data collection two activities, the first denominated by probing and another one of production of text about the local socialreality. The results of the first polling activity, according to the criteria chosen by the author, showed: 02 students (two) are at the pre-syllabic level; 04 (four) are at the syllabic level; 06 (six) are at the syllabic-alphabetic level; 09 (nine) are on the alphabetical level, totaling 21 participants. On the other hand, the textual production activity presented different results: of the 21 students who participated in the research, only 1 (one) was not able to perform the activity, while 9 (nine) students used writing hypotheses, without designating them as texts; 08 (eight) students produced texts classified as regular and 04 (four) students produced texts classified as satisfactory, according to the research parameters.