04. Unidade Acadêmica de Garanhuns (UAG)
URI permanente desta comunidadehttps://arandu.ufrpe.br/handle/123456789/2947
Os trabalhos que compõem as coleções desta comunidade pertencem à produção científica da antiga Unidade Acadêmica de Garanhuns (UAG) da UFRPE entre os anos de 2018 e 2019.
Para ter acesso à produção acadêmica da Universidade Federal do Agreste Pernambucano (UFAPE) a partir de 2020 CLIQUE AQUI.Navegar
2 resultados
Resultados da Pesquisa
Item A aprendizagem de inglês como língua estrangeira a partir do uso das quatro habilidades básicas comunicativas em salas de aula de escolas da rede pública de São Bento do Una(2019-07-19) Melo, Karla Karolynne Souza de; Lima, Cristiano Soares de; http://lattes.cnpq.br/6931282608444674; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5342845037433005The present monograph aims at observing, analyzing and discussing the teaching approaches, methods and techniques used in English classes in two state schools in the city of São Bento do Una – PE, where the two respective internships for the English Internship subjects of our undergraduation course had been carried out. Based on Applied Linguistics, this research presents and discusses the possible presence and use of the four basic learning abilities in foreign language according to Silveira (1999), focusing, however, on speaking and listening as the ones that should be more emphasized in regular school teaching classes lest the students regard language teaching as something exclusively grammatical. In order to get to such point, it deems necessary to address the matter of the four existing language teaching approaches available today: the traditional approach; the structural approach; the cognitive approach and the communicative approach, understanding the role of each language ability in each approach and the role of each of these approaches in cass. Furthermore, a relation between the Brazilian PCN (National Curricular Parameters) and the kind of school teaching nowadays is established. In order to corroborate the hypothesis, authors such as Brown (1994), Schmitz (2007) and Silveira (1999) are brought. This work questions and inquires about the seeminglly lack of orality in several language classrooms and seeks to understand the reasons behind such fact. As such, a qualitative kind of research was chosen for the development of this work, having considered our corpus and the nature of the discussions to be conducted, which could be classified as case-study, once its non-exclusive relation to theoretical information, but also with field observtions and experiential comparisons and contrasts. What was found in the internship was the predominant use of the traditional approach with exercises involving only the grammar of EL.Item O ensino da oralidade no livro didático do 3º ano do ensino fundamental(2018-08-23) Araújo, Maria Aline Teixeira de; Silva, Leila Nascimento da; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5525936095476415; http://lattes.cnpq.br/8160106003052712The present work investigates what space is given to orality in the didactic textbook of the 3rd year of elementary school initial years, aiming to analyze the teaching of orality in a textbook. The specific objectives are: to identify the activities on the teaching of orality proposed in the textbook and to recognize which dimensions of oral teaching the book contemplates, seeking to verify the frequency with which they appear and what the work developed. The book analyzed is PNLD 2014, Project Buriti de Português. To analyze the object under study, we used documentary research, Lüdke and André (2012) and Severino (2007) with the content analysis approach, Bardin (1977). We used Dolz and Schneuwly (2004), Dolz, Schneuwly and Pietro (2004), Leal, Brandão and Lima (2012), Leal and Seal (2012) and Dolz, Schneuwly and Haller (2004). We also used the research done with textbooks of the authors, Fernandes (2015), Brandão, Leal and Nascimento (2011), Costa (2006) and Leal, Brandão and Lima (2012). From the analysis carried out, we could observe that the book analyzed brings several activities that address orality, as well as some textual genres. What was left to be desired was the absence of one of the dimensions of oral teaching, the valorization of oral tradition texts . We conclude that it is a good collection, because it brings a good amount of activities, however, still needs some changes, in what deals with much more elaborate activities, giving space for a better development of orality.